Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07B94E7F5 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34538 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2013 14:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34481 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2013 14:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34377 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2013 14:03:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.41] (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:03:06 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bs12so303367qab.0 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/6fVw3PzV8LIe2VlJApW0bNDe76dnnHMOwyc6vtDS34=; b=zQrzqIxxGCCh0UmuJ5HY9w5VBnkJYpxKHdhiTlrobLBThFocbXm2XeCk1Gr/5EmDc+ 7CE2mF8XNDYME3U7OmuG60cmoPZEVoYBJjGgKqEfPRVbahluOn94nDSKeEtu2qGJwCle hmap6nBdaWF3EpQmz2k8RebdJDAgNLYL/RGFBmkDBwJMM+Ah7vOTlmb0cPmMeeDys84e HuN9C/zOk305t1cQdfsigf4qihRiqaZez7wt4CQeooadqAe90qVvoZBanmBu/HA5WQho xy/I3XHuJOhsoVKFGLyDhgi/Uqpcr8pY+oGk8g8FC1KguQBhGtaNuo3AWDMEITaLuLwu bpmw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.219.69 with SMTP id ht5mr5486103qab.88.1363356165726; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.64.232 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2D0E6DEE-EB63-4F18-9950-C13F50D04F23@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:02:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comments threads on Github From: Benoit Chesneau To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Till, yeah. My original email was my knee-jerk. And I knew it sounded > awful as I was writing it. (See the end of the email for the admission of > that.) I think pulling in the comments *from* Github is the way forward > here. I see Jan is pursing this with Infra at the moment. Thanks Jan! And > thanks folks for putting up with my thinking-out-loud. > > > On 15 March 2013 12:41, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On Mar 15, 2013, at 13:36 , till wrote: >> >> > I think requiring the mailing list is counter intuitive. I know what t= he >> rules and regulations are, but it's often an advantage when comments and >> discussion happen where the related code is. Everything else (e.g. >> copy/pasting URL references in an additional email to satisfy maybe >> slightly out-dated rules and regulations) is too much work. ;-) >> > >> > Maybe I can try to help bridging comments to this mailing list if want= ed. >> >> yeah, what we need/want is a script that not only notifies this list of >> created and closed pull requests, but also the comments made on them. II= RC >> I chatted with Paul Davis about this at ApacheCon EU and I don=92t recal= l >> anything blocking this except extending the script that does the current >> email notifications to do more. Paul can correct me. >> >> I=92m major +1 on making Pull Requests a first class citizen on this lis= t. >> >> Cheers >> Jan hrm, isn't there any review tool available in the apache ecosystem too? I'm worried about all the history on the you give to a third party which is I think the original intention of having most of the things done on the mls and in apache sources repositories. There are projects around that discuss about patches on the ml with diff attached. Which is also cool and make me able to have the thread on my machine when I'm off for a few hours. - beno=EEt