Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: The BigCouch merge, CouchDB 2.0, 3.0 and later
From: Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKmKYaDkDDtWuc3Mxba63qsXNeUAUud66MQtZL-=eEhtJnT9LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:42:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8462412E-3F58-4383-85A1-BAE73E95290C@apache.org>
References: <6760C936-9099-4031-9844-650F46A18341@apache.org>
 <CAKmKYaDkDDtWuc3Mxba63qsXNeUAUud66MQtZL-=eEhtJnT9LQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org


On Mar 31, 2013, at 21:32 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> Bikeshed away! :)
> 
> Will there be discussion on API changes for BigCouch stuff? I don't
> really have a clue on how BigCouch is different from CouchDB exactly,
> all I know is it does some clustering and that's why some things are
> different. In my perception (as someone who doesn't really need
> clustering), it seems that "different" would be "more complicated"
> here in most cases, so I'm a little bit ambivalent about BigCouch
> merging into CouchDB (although obviously there could be lots of great
> stuff too, I don't really know!).

We will be collecting things here:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1756

There is an (incomplete) list of differences down on:

  http://bigcouch.cloudant.com/api


Robert & Paul et.al will help getting the COUCHDB-1765 filled out for
discussion & details.


> Also, +1 on Jan's point re minimizing the amount and size of flag days
> (i.e. big 2.0.0 release).

Thanks :)


Cheers
Jan
--