couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1
Date Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:36:16 GMT
We use VCS because we're using SvnPubSub to publish to the Foundation-wide
distribution directory. I believe this makes the sysadmin stuff easier. And
I guess it adds an audit trail for the things we're shipping.


On 15 March 2013 16:28, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Mar 15, 2013, at 17:22 , matt j. sorenson <matt@sorensonbros.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> <Justin Timberlake voice>
> >>
> >> 1,000,000 commits isn't cool. You know what's cool? 1,000,000,000.
> >>
> >> </Justin Timberlake voice>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14 March 2013 19:16, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 01:05 , Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 13 March 2013 23:18, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>> Dave,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For rc.2, there is no need to pull the binaries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We should be leaving them in the Subversion /dev directory.
> >>>>
> >>>> Point taken, but thats going to be one fat svn repo in 6 months time.
> >>>> Just saying!
> >>>
> >>>    “Revision 1456616”
> >>>              — svn.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >>
> >
> > right I'm not sure why large transient binary files need revision
> > control... we really ought to have a sharepoint site for those
>
> This is to easier distribute binaries over release mirrors.
>
> I agree it is odd that we do this for RCs, but Noah checked with Infra,
> and that’s what we got (afaik). Either way, no biggie.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
> >
> > /me ducks and hides
> > --
> > matt
>
>


-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message