couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Status of 1.2.x and 1.3.x branches
Date Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:09:39 GMT
Thanks for the info guys.

Wendall, were you able to ascertain whether the failures were in CouchDB or
the tests?

For the record, ./configure --disable-tests is a workaround if you need it.
;)


On 18 March 2013 22:48, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

> Great summary Wendall!
>
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 23:41 , Wendall Cada <wendallc@83864.com> wrote:
>
> > Note: I am not a committer for the project, I've just been following
> this current release cycle closely.
> >
> > For 1.2.x
> > It appears as though all blockers have been resolved, allowing for a
> 1.2.2 rc.
>
> +1
>
> > For 1.3.x
> > Only issues remaining in the blockers list (
> http://s.apache.org/couchdb_130_blockers) are
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696 (Support Erlang/OTP
> R16B)
> >
> > The only other issues for 1.3.x, not on the list are the intermittent
> test failures.
>
> I fixed one of them at
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=f36232c8(COUCHDB-1711)
>
> and filed another one just now:
>
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1716
>
>
> > I think the only questions here remaining are:
> >
> > 1. Can 1.3.0 ship without COUCHDB-1696?
>
> Injecting the new Mochiweb is a non-trivial patch that I’d say we are not
> comfortable
> adding to a release branch with barely any testing. As much as it sucks
> I’d say we
> should ship 1.3.0 without R16B support with big warnings in the release
> notes.
>
> We should also merge the new Mochiweb asap and get our testing on and
> release a 1.3.1
> and 1.2.3 as soon as we are comfortable with it.
>
>
> > 2. Can 1.3.0 ship with known test issues?
>
> I don’t think we have much of a choice here, as the test suite remains
> brittle in some
> configurations. We are still on the way to make it better, but this isn’t
> done yet
> and I don’t think this will be doable in a short amount of time.
>
> We might want to opt for disabling or working around the tests that we
> know to fail.
>
>
> Again, thanks for compiling this!
>
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
> >
> > Wendall
> >
> > On 03/17/2013 09:58 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >> On Mar 16, 2013, at 21:46 , Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey devs,
> >>>
> >>> When will 1.2.x
> >> 1.2.x is ready for 1.2.2 now.
> >>
> >>> and 1.3.x be ready for me to cut release candidates?
> >> There are a few issues up on http://s.apache.org/couchdb_130_blockersthat are
being worked through.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jan
> >
>
>


-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message