couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1
Date Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:28:29 GMT

On Mar 15, 2013, at 17:22 , matt j. sorenson <matt@sorensonbros.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> <Justin Timberlake voice>
>> 
>> 1,000,000 commits isn't cool. You know what's cool? 1,000,000,000.
>> 
>> </Justin Timberlake voice>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 March 2013 19:16, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 01:05 , Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 13 March 2013 23:18, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Dave,
>>>>> 
>>>>> For rc.2, there is no need to pull the binaries.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We should be leaving them in the Subversion /dev directory.
>>>> 
>>>> Point taken, but thats going to be one fat svn repo in 6 months time.
>>>> Just saying!
>>> 
>>>    “Revision 1456616”
>>>              — svn.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> NS
>> 
> 
> right I'm not sure why large transient binary files need revision
> control... we really ought to have a sharepoint site for those

This is to easier distribute binaries over release mirrors.

I agree it is odd that we do this for RCs, but Noah checked with Infra,
and that’s what we got (afaik). Either way, no biggie.

Cheers
Jan
-- 


> 
> /me ducks and hides
> --
> matt


Mime
View raw message