couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Please review console.log() branch
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:48:19 GMT

On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:38 , Jason Smith <jhs@iriscouch.com> wrote:

> It used to be called "js_file" however it is properly the result of the
> ["log", "..."] command from the view server.
> 
> How about "views_log_file"?

the view server’s real name is query_server.

So maybe query_server_log?

> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> "view_file" is an awkward name, won't output from shows, lists, etc,
>> also land here?
>> 
>> On 5 February 2013 10:15, Jason Smith <jhs@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I want to merge this:
>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commits/console_log
>>> 
>>> Please comment if you have a moment. It is two changes.
>>> 
>>> ## console.log()
>>> 
>>> In addition to good old log(), there is console.log(). It behaves exactly
>>> like Node.js. It supports a format string and variable arguments.
>>> 
>>>    console.log("doc id is %s and count is %d", doc._id, doc.count)
>>>    console.dir("doc = %j", doc) // JSON format
>>>    console.log("Full request\n%s", util.inspect(req))
>>>    return {
>>>      body: util.format("<title>%s</title", title)
>>>    }
>>>    // etc.
>>> 
>>> ## Separate log file for JavaScript
>>> 
>>> _config/log/view_file = "js.log"
>>> 
>>> If this is set, every log() or console.log() will additionally go to this
>>> file. There are no timestamps, no formatting. It is like a console.
>>> 
>>> I was thinking of adding /_log support, cleaning it up, and then merging
>> it
>>> in.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Iris Couch


Mime
View raw message