couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: branch names
Date Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:44:07 GMT
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 19:19 , Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> just a heads up, the scheme for branch names we agreed on
> >> is: 1532-feature-add-docs No underscores. Please follow
> >> this.
> >>
> >> The fact that the cors branch doesn’t follow this is a
> >> historic artefact that I thought wasn’t worth cleaning
> >> up, but it looks I was wrong.
> >>
> >> From now on, I will rule with an iron fist about getting
> >> these details right. Current branches with diverging names
> >> are exempt.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jan
> >> --
> >>
> >
> > Actually we were agree to discuss that later a little more.
>
> Nope, we made a decision:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201210.mbox/%3cDEC04DB0-172C-4517-8554-2BE049A2F606@apache.org%3e
>
>
I only said:

"Anyway if we stay with the current situation yes having one referent doc
would be good."

wasn't considering it so strict neither as a decision. Anyway if most
think it should be done like this then go.

- benoit

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message