Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCE37D240 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77002 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 15:02:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 76868 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 15:02:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 76827 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 15:02:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:02:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:02:50 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e10so3554944iej.11 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FtfqOseMHODoXNiOzqT40NSwajUigC3c+Jvb/bEfVVM=; b=kdSknXRoTM90bs3sCcPOv4yuInFuErvfDiZ6C4dWYQrVkR/oLI4Aqm0+uJlcC9IreN bOivTZxIIFQOaNt/N0TMtLiuKEilT+aqLY1LnYB8U5qu253wAEc9BIGmW9iR+eCcrreY u+XCIk9wDn+0JVgGjR9xFh2QaWUZJ/COQQzSDZ8H9uZKhyPbiLc14jcbvz96kVA1fpWt 333r750aNFeC5qm+2Jcx2vBkPrC9gueuTU7Sh5kZpJBsmGj1QIJBJVhOMhhWvrECmpS6 O4c4G8z2pXc9+CWrWhTHKzwH45Rqxyw1ntqbH23+BBkDxlJJbFhf/F3XCJwehcFedWdY njHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.7.135 with SMTP id j7mr1533172iga.34.1351782149931; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.77.196 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8ECBF090-2FA5-426B-93BF-D8DC7858B24F@apache.org> References: <62FB425D-453A-4F9F-8BAA-A38E1E219FE4@apache.org> <8ECBF090-2FA5-426B-93BF-D8DC7858B24F@apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:02:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Source code layout From: Benoit Chesneau To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044472d5dc424304cd704e37 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044472d5dc424304cd704e37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote= : > I see. So the enhanced layout is something we would do to better organiz= e > couch_core. Aside from that you're still talking about following the > general layout that you've used with rcouch, right? > > Adam > > still undecided if it's better to have a core composed of multiple apps in the repo or one app but nested folders in src like the inets thing, but yes= . - beno=EEt --f46d044472d5dc424304cd704e37--