From dev-return-23836-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Sat Nov 3 16:51:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 537EED336 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16998 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2012 16:51:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16960 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2012 16:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16952 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2012 16:51:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:51:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:50:55 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e10so6114768iej.11 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=G7lA/HYEoS9UjJ8v1xRgm8FVny8j8Yl2f32BECMtssY=; b=tALNkKAvDu3W/c0/7FdQB4er5OrG8WjjK+j8nY42mGx3zvuN2Flvo/gjlD3oMpa7sS 6afDPgHD6pOl7YfgGE0R47T4WcZ+FSZwP1/iegNAVaEEYOgVfonO75rRhd8wguNnAjaI M9aZWF8Ct2PKL4G0lhXE2G6rJq5IPnx16pX52fQTgOlWrVeRs7jwGd5wdD2h9TtGBzru b5/gzV484qd9SYjN9he3y9sYlR4QSqNPtixTGzOyjJsqmFbOf9nhyfVJcmqptOV07Yhz Qq57jsdW+HA3uaUlwERZCskdUE+MC3Gnowkj1R3L0Z3lgPJbq+2+zcRZ9z84iVaze2vf rCWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.42.226 with SMTP id r2mr5036223igl.34.1351961434808; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.77.196 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <-3674264034947448062@unknownmsgid> References: <7D76050A-3095-46A3-81EA-2DB30E78E263@apache.org> <87B791B0-2812-41FB-A91B-E005EB785D9B@apache.org> <-1717312505309328610@unknownmsgid> <-3674264034947448062@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:50:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: branching in couchdb From: Benoit Chesneau To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934055f12632c04cd9a0d04 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae934055f12632c04cd9a0d04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i don't want to have to always have to use a tool to just sort branches by topic. I'm fine to have topic branches associated to their jira naming. Sounds like a good idea. - beno=EEt On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Robert Newson wrot= e: > I'd say the policy on branch deletions is "don't" but others might > disagree. git branch --no-merged is useful. > > Sent from the ocean floor > > On 3 Nov 2012, at 16:38, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Robert Newson >wrote: > > > >> Or just leave it out entirely like we said at the start of all this. > > so at then end we will have XXXXXXXXXXX branches. Or rather what is the > > policy to delete branches? > > > > - benoit > --14dae934055f12632c04cd9a0d04--