couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randall Leeds <>
Subject Re: website - should we target the devs a little more
Date Sat, 03 Nov 2012 01:22:21 GMT
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Benoit Chesneau <>wrote:

> Hi all,
> Early in the morning I installed a new machine without anything around and
> I couldn't remember the right link to the repository... So obviously I went
> on our website to look at the link; But couldn't find it either. I couldn't
> find it until I end to the Quick Links section. Which was after all logical
> but ot so much intuitive (a dev is also a contributor ...).
> Anyway I'm worried that this 1 page site isn't the appropriate way to
> present the project.
> 1. This big font (at least on chrome) doesn't help to read at all. And
> links can't be easily  read due  to the thickness of it too

This one is going to be subjective. I do think we should change the default
link text color so it's not the same as the rest of the text. That would
make it stand out more clearly. Especially because many useful links are in
the body text and not in the menus.

> 2. We should have a real dev sections to target devs, presenting couchdb
> internals & such like here :
> or
>  an not a simple wiki page . It's
> important for other to present couchdb internals so other developer know
> where to hack. And it's important to attract more devs to couchdb I think.

IMO it's not a problem to have this on a wiki. Our wiki front page reads
somewhat like I re-arranged it to try to be more narrative
last time I sprinted on the docs for a day. I would like to do it again and
I'll keep this in mind. Of course.... nobody wait for me :)

Maybe it would be good to get the Wiki out of Quick LInks and into the top

> 3. For other and I think the new doc site will help we should have
> something like

Yeah, a lot will maybe change when the docs land. For now, I'm concerned
about your original problem: not finding the source quickly. I think we
should at least add the source repo under the Downloads section. Maybe add
a line which reads "Source (repository)".

Although, now I think about it more. It really is important that people can
get to the source really fast. Maybe we should just have a "fork" link at
the top? A section for it? Something to get here really, really fast:

> On a side note I don't find the slogan "Apache CouchDB is a database that
> uses JSON for documents, Javascript for MapReduce queries and regular HTTP
> for an API" isn't quite good. If I came here for the first time I would say
> "and?" .  Replications, Views, Rendering (couchapps) and Reliable &
> Elastiic (when bigcouch will come) are imo some selling points that speak
> more to the end user.

Agreed. Let's propose some rewrites. Some text from applies. It needs to communicate
the awesome without getting stuck in the details. Different things are
awesome to different people, though. Example: Erlang was one reason I got
involved. Someone else might not care what language it's written in at all.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message