couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randall Leeds <randall.le...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Let’s ship 1.3.0 now.
Date Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:17:39 GMT
+1

We can do a round up of the status of 1.3 blockers during this week's
meeting and get the focus around it, make sure there's actions for everyone
who needs them for everything to get done.


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>wrote:

> The point of not including cors in 1.3 is precisely so we're not rushing
> things. Historically we have had a habit of wanting "the next big feature"
> in "the next big release" which tends to make our releases drag out a bit
> as we wait on volunteers to work through the big features. The idea behind
> time based releases is that we'll have releases regularly and then won't
> need to rush to get big features done quickly because the delay between
> releases will only be a couple months instead of in the 6-12 month range.
>
> +1 on releasing (assuming that all blocker bugs are cleared, I haven't
> checked the list lately) without CORS and docs.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, john.tiger <john.tigernassau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > this feels rushed - not a good thing with an enterprise thing like a db -
> > does couch have big users that need the as is 1.3 features asap or even
> > sponsors that are wanting to ship every 3 mos regardless ?  If not, why
> not
> > wait and rally troops to make sure cors features are set, documentation
> is
> > done, and some compiling issues are resolved - maybe the committee has
> > other reasons, but 3 mos seems really quick for an enterprise thing like
> a
> > db.
> >
> > Others mlge may vary but we want to use the cors feature - could care
> less
> > about a 1.3 without it
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/13/2012 01:08 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 13, 2012, at 20:53 , Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>  On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  if it's part of 1.3.
> >>>>>
> >>>> The point of this email is to decouple cors & docs from 1.3.0.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  I forgot a "not" obviously.. Sorry for that
> >>>
> >> Clarified via IRC:
> >>
> >> [21:00:26] <benoitc> well was just me trying to ask "do we really want
> to
> >> ship at least without docs? "
> >> [21:00:39] <benoitc> but i'm fine with both
> >> [21:00:40] <+jan____> ah, I’d say yes.
> >> [21:01:12] <benoitc> i wonder if we couldn't put the doc online for 1.3
> >> at least
> >> [21:01:39] <benoitc> since that part can be easily done
> >> http://rcouch.org/docs/
> >> [21:01:58] <+jan____> sure, why not, that’s completely unrelated to
the
> >> release
> >> [21:02:18] <benoitc> indeed
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jan
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message