couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <robert.new...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Futon.Next Proof of Concept
Date Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:52:09 GMT
The point being that it wouldn't be the file you would edit.

And many +-1's to Noah's scheme to hand out more commit bits. Bring it.

Sent from the ocean floor

On 3 Nov 2012, at 16:44, Octavian Damiean <mainerror@gmail.com> wrote:

> Compiled artifact in this case means, compiled LESS files to CSS (minified
> or not), JavaScript (minified or not) and HTML. So no bytecode, it would
> still be readable (except minified JS and CSS are a bit hard to read bit
> still plaintext).
>
> Cheers,
> Octavian
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Also, Bob sed:
>>
>> If the choice is node as a build dependency versus checking in compiled
>>> artifacts, I choose node.
>>
>>
>> Perhaps someone can clarify for me what a compiled artefact is? We can't
>> ship compiled code. We can ship compressed or package code. But if we're
>> compiling code into bytecode or machine code, that is a complete no-no in
>> both our repos and our releases.
>>
>> --
>> NS
>>

Mime
View raw message