Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 435BFD2F7 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4402 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 17:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4364 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 17:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4353 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2012 17:01:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.52] (HELO mail-ee0-f52.google.com) (74.125.83.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:33 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b57so1491531eek.11 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xKBH6q65Hmnk/5JGT2TEiQJtezwQ2wPkP9MWs7GMZ2c=; b=Gs1NrRrwFGio2zDBt8GK4XUmUsNbCxR1INHYUdlJjYLUv1NTyrCJMNKafbNsnpgAkX GgyKIzZqERWNBZnme2arlROKK4R118RGEb55PuWlosB+15lc01t56suw/MmaUb8qKo/y 8AWMusMNowQOnUAZAv0A82JxNMmVorXu/6k2Lx5jzl7iCZO0nVxPhxurfDFsovcak699 qEIRUjYTnOKjG5DD1To5aKoMUr4l+CMmHrITxpEif02bG8Qg7PISYSa/SSspuT79dNg+ sQwBlrMWoZk+YHlfvYotzpsn/1BHcfSmXNxD7KZji/hGQ6gmQjvmMDhOEFC0MQUqeKI7 BprA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.68 with SMTP id 44mr18014306eea.1.1351011672048; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.137.204 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branching for the CouchDB 1.3 release From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >> All, >> >> It's been a while since we released and I want to change this now. I >> propose making a 1.3.x branch from today's master >> (66529378dd06342929e04772370f3509cbe786a5) and building 1.3.0 there. >> >> As I understand, the principal outstanding issues blocking the 1.3.0 >> release are; >> >> 1) Randall Leed's backports of fixes from 1.2.0. This code is written >> and I have reviewed it, though more eyes are appreciated. >> 2) The CORS patch. This has been around for a very long time but has >> not reached our repository in any form. Earlier this month I proposed >> that if it does not appear in usable form by the end of the calendar >> month, it gets bumped to the next release. >> 3) The blockers marked in JIRA. >> >> I think all of those things can land on 1.3.x and master. >> >> Can I get some votes on my proposal to branch today please? >> >> B. > > -1 the branch should appear once all patches are landed. What would be > the reason to branch now? > i mean there is no reason to branch right now. We should make sure to release when everything is frozen. If not we will continuously go from one branch to the other which could be really problematic. cf last story of 1.2. - benoit