couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: branching in couchdb
Date Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:39:20 GMT
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 16:23 , Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> No objection from me, Jan.  I don't see the need for a dedicated
> "develop" branch at the moment, but then I've not worked intensively on a
> project which had one.
> >>
> >> Adam
> >
> > I think the intention there is if you have a sufficiently large test
> > suite that accurately represents reality. Thus when you're landing
> > features in quick succession you have a place to test the combination
> > before they "go live". I'm not sure we really have that (also
> > considering that we run our test suite locally and don't rely on a
> > central CI server).
>
> Good summary!
>
> I think we want to be working towards that, but yeah, we are not
> really there yet, and we don't have many concurrent features and
> fixes going on.
>
> But again, I am happy to reconsider this, when we run into issues
> with the current setup.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> I'm not sure it will help when we will have n branches. Also I think we
should have more test and c-i. The current situation is not that good and
we spoke about it at the boston summit.

Anyway if we stay with the current situation yes having one referent doc
would be good.

- benoit

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message