couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Date Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:06:46 GMT
I am hoping Dave can chip in here with his experience getting the Windows
build integrated.

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@php.net> wrote:

> Thanks Hans!
>
> I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts
> imported so it doesn't live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.
>
> Can you comment on what would be needed there?
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Noah
> >
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >
> > Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
> >
> > "
> > On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> >> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
> >> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
> >>
> >> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
> >> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
> >> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
> >> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
> >> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
> >> osx build in the sources btw ?
> >> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
> >> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
> >> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
> >> sources in the repository when  it comes from an apache project?
> >>
> >> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
> >> (Is the process started) ?
> >
> > "
> >
> > 1. ->  Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> > 2. -> should be no problem
> > 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
> >
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >
> > The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk
> layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of
> the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
> >
> > How is this done for the Windows build?
> >
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >
> > I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
> >
> > - Hans
> >
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Great news!
> >>
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >>
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >>
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Noah,
> >>>
> >>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
> >>>
> >>> - Hans
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> >>>> (See subject prefix!)
> >>>>
> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >>>>
> >>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> >>> fix.
> >>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
> on
> >>> it
> >>>> a little?
> >>>>
> >>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> >>> this
> >>>> release?
> >>>>
> >>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> NS
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message