couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: branching in couchdb
Date Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:41:21 GMT

On Oct 31, 2012, at 16:39 , Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 16:23 , Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> No objection from me, Jan.  I don't see the need for a dedicated
>> "develop" branch at the moment, but then I've not worked intensively on a
>> project which had one.
>>>> 
>>>> Adam
>>> 
>>> I think the intention there is if you have a sufficiently large test
>>> suite that accurately represents reality. Thus when you're landing
>>> features in quick succession you have a place to test the combination
>>> before they "go live". I'm not sure we really have that (also
>>> considering that we run our test suite locally and don't rely on a
>>> central CI server).
>> 
>> Good summary!
>> 
>> I think we want to be working towards that, but yeah, we are not
>> really there yet, and we don't have many concurrent features and
>> fixes going on.
>> 
>> But again, I am happy to reconsider this, when we run into issues
>> with the current setup.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>> 
>> I'm not sure it will help when we will have n branches. Also I think we
> should have more test and c-i. The current situation is not that good and
> we spoke about it at the boston summit.

Fully agreed!

> Anyway if we stay with the current situation yes having one referent doc
> would be good.

I updated http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Merge_Procedure.

Cheers
Jan
-- 





Mime
View raw message