couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@php.net>
Subject Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Date Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:34:08 GMT
Thanks Hans!

I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts imported so it doesn't
live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.

Can you comment on what would be needed there?

Cheers
Jan
--

On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de> wrote:

> Hi, Noah
> 
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> 
> Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
> 
> "
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
>> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
>> 
>> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
>> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
>> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
>> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
>> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
>> osx build in the sources btw ?
>> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
>> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
>> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
>> sources in the repository when  it comes from an apache project?
>> 
>> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
>> (Is the process started) ?
> 
> "
> 
> 1. ->  Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> 2. -> should be no problem
> 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
> 
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> 
> The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The additional
wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
> 
> How is this done for the Windows build?
> 
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
> 
> I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3. 
> 
> - Hans
> 
> 
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> 
>> Hans,
>> 
>> Great news!
>> 
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>> 
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>> 
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Noah,
>>> 
>>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>>> 
>>> - Hans
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey,
>>>> 
>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>>> 
>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>>> fix.
>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
>>> it
>>>> a little?
>>>> 
>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>>> this
>>>> release?
>>>> 
>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> NS
> 

Mime
View raw message