Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CAF3C432 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46851 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2012 15:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46799 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2012 15:13:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46780 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2012 15:13:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:13:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of klimpong@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bk0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:12:55 +0000 Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4363441bkc.11 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:12:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=7gDmwrHhQ+sUaJ7FUxgzGRktK2vB1BB3t0xUUzONsIY=; b=G6Tg4QHcOH/6gIAV4PLusZPa++htTJu7ZzxrN7GR/UiMkqWXX9lgOnhtkspEEySROa KO4Pp2ysO+08m3LFxHGjmJP//EErkld58gTyggPfSHXrqfSYemT42siIAdGXiKqm3or9 anllvoVNb4CWq68/j+NZS0EzcytCL/Wcvt0QuKfZIFziKEZ7f+zaeknk4dhGD5atvkH2 /Exhs0hKtYjxfA7YYDwYsvVRr4Nisz4FC2kODwKYHTvnMv/whMXw7CYjVYnNo5pL123j ufknPT5vQf4Z2N9jOgqHrCOYuyULIzRPs7DCLZooueyvLLIgv8aiQWtOtTOJWTmi1I+Y 13Yg== Received: by 10.204.10.70 with SMTP id o6mr10483128bko.70.1339427552308; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.226] (p5795AFF5.dip.t-dialin.net. [87.149.175.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iq16sm16844857bkc.6.2012.06.11.08.12.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:12:28 +0200 From: till To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Cc: user@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <5FC3BB9E829A4107AD29CF578730A107@gmail.com> <93626EF38C2B4D4D932643FA0D2956A8@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CouchDB packaging for Ubuntu X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.1 (build 1081.51) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4fd60adc_5e963896_1357" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --4fd60adc_5e963896_1357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Ok, my working repo is here: https://github.com/till/couchdb-deb So does anyone have any idea how to debug failed test cases=3F They never= failed for me before. :D Till On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 4:37 PM, CGS wrote: > Not at all. After all, I do not do this for my personal interest, but f= or > this community. I am glad if I can help. > =20 > Cheers, > CGS > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, till wrote: > =20 > > Hey, > > =20 > > thanks, I'm gonna test this shortly. Do you mind if I push it one of = my > > repo=3F > > =20 > > Till > > =20 > > =20 > > On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, CGS wrote: > > =20 > > > Hi, > > > =20 > > > I isolated the tests which are started with make check and make the= m run > > over the default installation under Ubuntu 12.10. Please, let me know= if it > > is what you need (there is a README file in the archive). > > > =20 > > > CGS > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:46 PM, till > klimpong=40gmail.com (mailto:klimpong=40gmail.com))> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > =20 > > > > =5B CC'd user=40 to get more feedback. =5D > > > > =20 > > > > I made some progress. > > > > =20 > > > > I have builds for the following more or less ready: > > > > =20 > > > > * karmic > > > > * lucid > > > > * maverick > > > > * oneiric > > > > * natty > > > > * precise > > > > =20 > > > > It's building and I am trying to refine the process a bit. So it = might > > break in between =5Baka WIP=5D. I'm just adding this as a disclaimer.= > > > > =20 > > > > https://launchpad.net/=7Etill-php/+archive/couchdb > > > > =20 > > > > Would you mind testing my builds=3F :) So far, I only tested luci= d > > briefly (and ran into the xulrunner issue, which I think I have auto-= fixed > > now). Besides I just started it up, created a DB and entered some doc= s into > > it. > > > > =20 > > > > (Also, =40Jan:) > > > > =20 > > > > I'm trying to figure out how to setup more automated testing. =22= make > > check=22 always requires the source tree to be present, I'd like =22m= ake check=22 > > against my installed binaries. I saw the =22verify installation=22 in= =46uton =E2=80=93 > > something like that for the command line so I can iterate on these bu= ilds > > and trigger a =22test this=22 in a continuous integration setup. Buil= ding is > > part of it, but since building a binary and installing it are two sep= arate > > steps I want to ensure that the second step also works. I am still tr= ying > > to wrap my head around a setup where I can maybe knife up a few insta= nces > > in THE CLOUD, install my package, run its test-suite and confirm. > > > > =20 > > > > Till > > > > =20 > > > > On Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 11:13 PM, CGS wrote: > > > > =20 > > > > > Hi, > > > > > =20 > > > > > I have CouchDB 1.2.0 with Erlang R15B01 on Ubuntu 12.10 up and > > running. > > > > > Unfortunately, I've never built a deb package, so, I cannot pro= vide > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > such a > > > > > package. Nevertheless, if you have any problem in building it, = just > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > let me > > > > > know and I will try to help. > > > > > =20 > > > > > About the mailing list, I suppose adding the CouchDB users (to = get > > an idea > > > > > which is the desired Ubuntu distro) and/or Debian (you may get > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > support in > > > > > testing and debugging) lists wouldn't be such a bad idea, but i= t's > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > your > > > > > call here. > > > > > =20 > > > > > CGS > > > > > =20 > > > > > =20 > > > > > =20 > > > > > =20 > > > > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:15 PM, till > klimpong=40gmail.com) (mailto:klimpong=40gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > =20 > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > I've been scratching my own itch and started building 1.2.0 f= or a > > couple > > > > > > Ubuntu distributions. > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > It's a WIP but I was wondering the following: > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > 1) It builds =E2=80=93 but does it work=3F Is the best bet to= run the test > > suite in > > > > > > futon, or is there something I could run on the command line = when > > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > the > > > > > > package is installed=3F I'd prefer the command line to includ= e it in > > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > some > > > > > > sort of continuous testing without a browser. > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > 2) Who'd have some interest in testing this=3F > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > 3) Which distributions are wanted =E2=80=93 I started with ka= rmic and > > lucid and > > > > > > had planned to build all the way up to 12.10. > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > 4) Is there a mailing list to discuss this, or is dev=40 fine= =3F > > > > > > =20 > > > > > > Till > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > Attachments: > > > - couchdb=5Fetap.tgz > > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 --4fd60adc_5e963896_1357--