Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E6C39ECC for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36341 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2012 16:57:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 36269 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2012 16:57:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 36253 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2012 16:57:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cgsmcmlxxv@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.53] (HELO mail-qa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.216.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:23 +0000 Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32so2467944qad.5 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KftRNj/9tAAvKcUNbj0LU419bKZg4YMjt+dIc328J+Q=; b=McuVo2G6Px6MxhD3gJ7dC3nGY+UjbgujHCC6vz6vzPARiDT0qP0bQ83rBLy0uXu7Ip sCwbHTo5dw3i7CvEBUj0c8s78I6PyD6ONCBzIpTq4yrDny/Eft309jWj1m7VGdA1MdD+ iMVRTEeIatvq5z547gTXZlsTx4ZwqUwT+vrf9lwkhCvI2QDkaswvhL4yzTBZidSvM9FJ Z5l6F5QovKDqkKseOIChBCnWjJOesstZTF/GXPf/wRMyd2+Bhf9B3lVt8MJWAHS9QvH2 kBiDXj7U/+HlEpoTJWGqc6fWzpSMhi/HrLwNIpaor/YK2b6cnuNqZQ1TyH/oTMXpphwD fIKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.181.203 with SMTP id bz11mr14590786qab.55.1339433822087; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.157.20 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5FC3BB9E829A4107AD29CF578730A107@gmail.com>

<93626EF38C2B4D4D932643FA0D2956A8@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:57:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB packaging for Ubuntu From: CGS To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Cc: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303b40552a692304c2353de2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303b40552a692304c2353de2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Let us know if any test fail and give us the log of the tests. The tests themselves are pretty self explanatory. If not, at least some tests are using the CouchDB log. So, I think there will be enough info for debugging. CGS On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:12 PM, till wrote: > Ok, > > my working repo is here: > https://github.com/till/couchdb-deb > > So does anyone have any idea how to debug failed test cases? They never > failed for me before. :D > > Till > > > On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 4:37 PM, CGS wrote: > > > Not at all. After all, I do not do this for my personal interest, but f= or > > this community. I am glad if I can help. > > > > Cheers, > > CGS > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, till klimpong@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > thanks, I'm gonna test this shortly. Do you mind if I push it one of = my > > > repo? > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, CGS wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I isolated the tests which are started with make check and make the= m > run > > > over the default installation under Ubuntu 12.10. Please, let me know > if it > > > is what you need (there is a README file in the archive). > > > > > > > > CGS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:46 PM, till klimpong@gmail.com) (mailto: > > > klimpong@gmail.com (mailto:klimpong@gmail.com))> wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > [ CC'd user@ to get more feedback. ] > > > > > > > > > > I made some progress. > > > > > > > > > > I have builds for the following more or less ready: > > > > > > > > > > * karmic > > > > > * lucid > > > > > * maverick > > > > > * oneiric > > > > > * natty > > > > > * precise > > > > > > > > > > It's building and I am trying to refine the process a bit. So it > might > > > break in between [aka WIP]. I'm just adding this as a disclaimer. > > > > > > > > > > https://launchpad.net/~till-php/+archive/couchdb< > https://launchpad.net/%7Etill-php/+archive/couchdb> > > > > > > > > > > Would you mind testing my builds? :) So far, I only tested lucid > > > briefly (and ran into the xulrunner issue, which I think I have > auto-fixed > > > now). Besides I just started it up, created a DB and entered some doc= s > into > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > (Also, @Jan:) > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to figure out how to setup more automated testing. "ma= ke > > > check" always requires the source tree to be present, I'd like "make > check" > > > against my installed binaries. I saw the "verify installation" in > Futon =96 > > > something like that for the command line so I can iterate on these > builds > > > and trigger a "test this" in a continuous integration setup. Building > is > > > part of it, but since building a binary and installing it are two > separate > > > steps I want to ensure that the second step also works. I am still > trying > > > to wrap my head around a setup where I can maybe knife up a few > instances > > > in THE CLOUD, install my package, run its test-suite and confirm. > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 11:13 PM, CGS wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have CouchDB 1.2.0 with Erlang R15B01 on Ubuntu 12.10 up and > > > running. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I've never built a deb package, so, I cannot > provide > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such a > > > > > > package. Nevertheless, if you have any problem in building it, > just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > let me > > > > > > know and I will try to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > About the mailing list, I suppose adding the CouchDB users (to > get > > > an idea > > > > > > which is the desired Ubuntu distro) and/or Debian (you may get > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > support in > > > > > > testing and debugging) lists wouldn't be such a bad idea, but > it's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > call here. > > > > > > > > > > > > CGS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:15 PM, till klimpong@gmail.com) (mailto: > > > klimpong@gmail.com) (mailto:klimpong@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been scratching my own itch and started building 1.2.0 > for a > > > couple > > > > > > > Ubuntu distributions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a WIP but I was wondering the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) It builds =96 but does it work? Is the best bet to run the > test > > > suite in > > > > > > > futon, or is there something I could run on the command line > when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > package is installed? I'd prefer the command line to include > it in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > sort of continuous testing without a browser. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Who'd have some interest in testing this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Which distributions are wanted =96 I started with karmic a= nd > > > lucid and > > > > > > > had planned to build all the way up to 12.10. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) Is there a mailing list to discuss this, or is dev@ fine? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > - couchdb_etap.tgz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --20cf303b40552a692304c2353de2--