From dev-return-22091-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org  Mon Apr 23 17:23:37 2012
Return-Path: <dev-return-22091-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0E809026
	for <apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:23:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 69098 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 17:23:37 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69057 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 17:23:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69029 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2012 17:23:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:23:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:23:28 +0000
Received: by lahi5 with SMTP id i5so11444231lah.11
        for <dev@couchdb.apache.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=nOjoti5CYeVpBL+cvBvetr24QmFoNxBPMNz274nQepg=;
        b=vWvovrhLT59Ztysta+AeRAEzX2MxbU0gEdqZ+wtCXOnabDVKiijhwYbzVVDkfQdBKY
         ny7QBmROvMl2dSx5LgEL+acpPxd0csRinPesnVX3JOZLt8UukkoE23J4pvap52NFgywy
         Ib7E/sORgggoUYquwvnrowDGA7s9R1UraIbFzFpj9eUkTzyBkT9SBuTrjX7VLe65bvbJ
         yQ5KIXsC/6wrqCeF9Uao84o6NHiCVYxC0GLb986ttDnlZ2+pI5Ods13j5mTwc9oLPvxJ
         yKnsFJxrNKucyK3EpIfHwKCXn/4MgBF4SazVQuTRFNoJUje7f2E1LqiH4jLe5p2W5Ea4
         v7Jw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.27.228 with SMTP id w4mr397373lbg.5.1335201787973; Mon, 23
 Apr 2012 10:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.20.234 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ_m3YCSnaWmMSwUdvjvApmXoz3nwPy2Ps-LPtaxsJNscfHbzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrexVJ4+DjmofqP5Rk5kuwNXCAb0TfcbJ=-DQ-qLmtnLxeU=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJNb-9pmrY9O4YqU1Vvpn1xO1B9chfwjCmGjctWqBHuQedLNGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKrexVJWSm5yeno0bzfEesAeHVUVAhYoKNd=F_i0wOAAyuV6Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ_m3YCSnaWmMSwUdvjvApmXoz3nwPy2Ps-LPtaxsJNscfHbzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:23:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJNb-9p91u8Mi_rOgQ5pifqkvRadSVxb_aay0rj5=jPyxU582g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey
From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:26 AM, CGS <cgsmcmlxxv@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Benoit,
>>
>> Thanks for the fast reply. It's sad how legal stuff stays in the way of
>> simplifying problems.
>>
>> Just another question (I am very curious today, it seems). Do other
>> licenses have the same impediment? I mean, for example, BSD license.
>>
>> CGS
>>
>
> No. But its also not strictly a licensing question.

well MPL license isn't compatible with apache2 (mean you can include
apache 2 code in mpl but not in the inverse).