Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B8E29DF9 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21040 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 20:33:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 21007 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 20:33:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 20997 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2012 20:33:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:33:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:32:57 +0000 Received: by lahi5 with SMTP id i5so2223454lah.11 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tBtWKbNXjhPm+5wUNMJ/HttoZcufyol23yrdTGVgNN4=; b=enT7/0Uh/kAyflaa6WA/AULD87kMV4dZ3KohinSaFnomFuWG2nn2ZbAZIphR+nbXyu 3WiX5+pADqiG8v3Z2CcQlmFZo5MiPW5PAL0XGYykXY3HLBmTtrV1LlyEVjN466y+42Ky 3lKgRvc96/rfJw6jrFFZd1XVpTxQPvU2fPfD0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=tBtWKbNXjhPm+5wUNMJ/HttoZcufyol23yrdTGVgNN4=; b=bDRnDt1I/Sg+L8rg0Rv+I6U9rioaExM82uM4yzHUMNt6MMPfOGhboVuTEgBU0GhnAO ogB2n/UrNcdAsxgjPLSe8z1x/HmELe71fPvqwZUbrMqLaIyjQrYObrTD/Pmjbd0xjALY t9J9Rl6yzjDwLAY1JaaxPUp0VqouUhL+iBhE9JoA0dNVIZ4WhcMGnWTNaYBeBPa/Yki6 Qft+qQ0O5RI/tVZlBzdrY/sNJUnfWvsPCMDh8JDkJ+0ekt6EDIG6fV/D00+J9twBIWIB ENc+lqURuQZLLZIPvprCPlQzyN/i9gLjoZU2ZFln1/7dXX6KPMF61S4v9oCORwb5BGll qIPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.100 with SMTP id ip4mr24674875lab.1.1332966757090; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.128.33 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:32:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [178.250.115.206] In-Reply-To: References: <3B540BCB-275F-4C0B-9FDF-2C30CA3E7604@apache.org> <7154760D-BD51-4AAA-AC14-D8A7598367DD@apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:32:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third round From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040838fd0dc57304bc538231 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljJ1Mb3G9/QTC4OdKCc6IWABUpyGTiSPaBLKntAS10U9mAeqwf0JR8KpzgUmbVnNih72aU --f46d040838fd0dc57304bc538231 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks! On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2012, at 20:25 , Noah Slater wrote: > > > This vote has been aborted. Thank you to everyone who participated. > > Hey Noah, > > I applied Filipe's patch from COUCHDB-1451 and ran `make distcheck` > and the browser tests and got all green. > > Since this doesn't affect 1.1.1, I don't think this should be noted in > CHANGES or NEWS. > > I'd say the 1.2.x is readier than ever to go out :) > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > >> > >> On Mar 28, 2012, at 20:07 , Filipe David Manana wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mar 28, 2012, at 19:58 , Filipe David Manana wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Stefan K=F6gl > >> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi everybody, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just wanted to raise some attention to the DB compaction bug > >> discovered today > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1451 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> While I initially discovered the bug with a 1.1.2 instance, this > could > >>>>>> also affect 1.2. I think this issue should be resolved before > closing > >>>>>> the vote. Filipe already provided a patch, so it shouldn't take to= o > >>>>>> long. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stefan, the patch is only for 1.2.x (and master). > >>>>> That exact issue can't happen on 1.1.x releases, as it's related to > >>>>> code added in 1.2.x. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm voting -1 on this round just because of this issue. > >>>> > >>>> Filipe, can you explain how frequent this issue would be? I can't > quite > >>>> discover the circumstances from the patch & commit message. > >>> > >>> Very frequent on some environments / work loads. It's highly timing > >>> sensitive. Happens if the compactor inserts the last batch of btree > >>> records in less than 500ms after the previous batch. > >> > >> That sounds common enough to me that we should avoid shipping this in > 1.2.0 > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >> > > --f46d040838fd0dc57304bc538231--