From dev-return-21746-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Tue Mar 27 17:38:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42DF99D10 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26438 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2012 17:38:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 26390 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2012 17:38:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 26381 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2012 17:38:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:38:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave@muse.net.nz designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vb0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:38:46 +0000 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23so170107vbz.11 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=sZDebPNhGiewNDVQ8rzTpuBWiUbfSry+q7bvEseS7cU=; b=hA9inpnFRKxdNUkmCsk90OOSchRNmLCzWySWxlL3RHzreYJsOavGbTgwDbkT+MAYLm raKeuIUixkkgLwBTmjeGLfxcDI1v7UrRQvBviqHE1ZY3lm1h6UmVzK493t9QIbZzgbIK ST2DEX04nGbQjPmOpYj2SHqIBAJsN4O31qU7XEtguBVpd+v+Q1uz51vSsSHdrMv6qUWz 4aD9sQZpz1lnYx1gXc07Rzg0QeL41KLw0YEd6PVu6O3y9JYvAHYtbhP7705ZKhB0XuAb KaiqM4mdLf/jBRnaVg1TW9I1UHa2I1qft9w0VBhTwujDi0Ppr8a5349+G390FCaKz5Jt FNJg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.175 with SMTP id a15mr10283241vdj.18.1332869905673; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.233 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [84.112.19.176] In-Reply-To: <412FB179-BAD3-436D-B415-F356A8AAAFD2@dionne-associates.com> References: <412FB179-BAD3-436D-B415-F356A8AAAFD2@dionne-associates.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:38:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Voting -1 on the first sign of issues (was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third round) From: Dave Cottlehuber To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmkxrmwF0iHGRzM6Y+BItMQu6EZ/HUBonef3Ced9T2/OxmUrdEg76OexMydt3Twy61ww2qP On 27 March 2012 14:19, Bob Dionne wrote: > Dave, > > Actually the rules are quite clear on this issue: > > "However, in no case may someone's vote be considered invalid if the implied commitment doesn't appear to be met; a vote is a formal expression of opinion, not of commitment." > > Cheers, > > Bob Hi Noah, Bob, In hindsight, you're right & I'd definitely be disappointed if somebody decided note to vote after reading my email. A+ Dave