From dev-return-21497-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Mar 15 19:22:56 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA63E9829 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82253 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 19:22:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82192 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 19:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82184 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2012 19:22:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:22:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:22:47 +0000 Received: by lahi5 with SMTP id i5so3715655lah.11 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LrMW+jbTMBZOBe6Bto68SugHpcAl92nJJish7uqm/SM=; b=Ndb4OwiStgGMwt+LKe42iWe9earrvV9gRPhVhtWJksXzkRHFUtI9IqqbQMXdkOtAwc VTN5gn9LNkqV+wnpvBJz1W0kEcB8hCuQHxzeR1s1Sn0+NgYkyDpBRUWldiuL8NOcRhh5 JVq3QxoTaL6k7pw6EADPwCDQL4mGAYfAjrPaY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=LrMW+jbTMBZOBe6Bto68SugHpcAl92nJJish7uqm/SM=; b=HrAM21Eh3EMcqTOWCQLO7X2B5oDZtdPYHNYenErqWW+OgOS2xb5N+iujOOmlo2ob2s JU22keu5qV6hTjDuet1xY1JXmbSmjbh9laZNBsca93uRJeyMaxSokfBYsJKjJVG8SK6J wmI0FAjFkFHIGAFWsvzeFuCygyfd/bu2E8+szDu08N4GRdRlUJ+i+vDp5Oejaa1ysUDB cF3Ek+k/4HbFXe1FqrVLMZrych3aG0Yw3RK8mjDjZYwqEV8l0W6ltk2gP2Ff8+v94qqQ 0E42b5kNDDCw8fgvNBrQmZQtJiI/kKr3gaOUPwFn35x9z3c1AofBFeGmCtg60cZsf3oM hANA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.202 with SMTP id x10mr2862924lbm.39.1331839347360; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.100.194 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:22:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [78.86.152.157] In-Reply-To: References: <0BB4F003-4C8B-441A-9CEF-08782AF170BB@dionne-associates.com> <-4709298919342606669@unknownmsgid> <4F60C606.5060409@83864.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:22:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.2.0 status update From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec55406ac32838804bb4d0325 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQJ1ZOuY9e6juKpR7kbt4CnzYVKddrf+fOHcPdCC+48ig2ZbHtAx3muTtLbxCSmURpyFKU X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec55406ac32838804bb4d0325 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote= : > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Noah Slater wrote= : > > > How long before we can land COUCHDB-1426? ;) > > Depends how much feedback and tests are given on that. Want to help? > I time for CouchDB is saturated, but I can help you test for sure. Is there anyone on this list that can spare a few cycles to help Beno=EEt test? Beno=EEt, how would you us to test? Is there a list of stuff you'd like people to try? > Keeping pressure like this start to annoy me. > Understood, and I am sorry that you feel annoyed. I know some people work well under pressure, and some people do not. If my last email did not adequately express why I want to apply pressure, no follow up will. But this is not how I expect us to operate under normal circumstances, so there is no need to worry. But these are not normal circumstances. As Jan keeps saying to me, we need some good news. > Some bugs especially though based on multiple configurations not on > the dev control could take time to resolve. And I completely share > paul's opinion on that. We should take time when it's about to keep > CouchDB robust and stable. > Agreed. (Though I will note that core stability, and configure time stability are two different beasts.) > Anyway was off during last 16h due to flights and saw that @davisp > posted a new version that should fix latest issues. Time to test. > Again, anyone wanna help out here? Most of us only have on specific environment we can test on, but the more the merrier I expect. Beno=EEt, could you throw a list of checkpoints for people to run through a= nd report back with? --bcaec55406ac32838804bb4d0325--