couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:31:09 GMT
Good catch, will do in the morning.

Cheers
Jan
--

On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:

> Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES?
> 
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote:
>> 
>>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part.
>>> 
>>> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
>>> 
>>> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424
>>> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426
>>> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
>> 
>> √
>> 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0
>> 
>> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with
>> the more canonical C version.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>> 
>>> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work
>>> * I will be driving round three, obviously
>>> 
>>> Let's kick some ass!
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The
>>>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity,
>>>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>>>> I think we should, at a minimum:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Abort this round
>>>>> * Land the R15B patch
>>>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy)
>>>>> * Start round three
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should try to:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424
>>>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues
>>>>> 
>>>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's
>>>> say
>>>>> a week.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some
>> sprints
>>>> to
>>>>> get these issues fixed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> Proposed Action:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points
>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be
done):
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B.
A patch
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB
1.2.1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance
regression
>>>> in
>>>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement
>>>> in
>>>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant
>>>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together
it
>>>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver
and the
>>>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing
>>>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message