couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wendall Cada <wenda...@83864.com>
Subject Re: Please report your indexing speed
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:18:03 GMT
Here are my 1.1.1 results on the same hardware/kernel/spidermonkey:

{"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.1.1"}
real    0m32.029s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.006s

Wendall

On 02/29/2012 01:30 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Benoit, could you run the 1.7.0 test for longer? Say, double the size
> of BULK_COUNT?
>
> Wendall, that's a useful new data point. Any chance you could compare
> 1.1.1 with 1.2 so we can line it up with the other results?
>
> B.
>
> On 29 February 2012 19:40, Wendall Cada<wendallc@83864.com>  wrote:
>> I'm using the bash script provided by Robert Newson.
>>
>> Linux version 3.2.7-1.fc16.i686.PAE
>> (mockbuild@x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 20111027 (Red
>> Hat 4.6.2-1) (GCC) )
>> spidermonkey 1.8.5
>> i686
>>
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.0.3"} (from stock fedora rpm Release:
>> 2.fc16)
>> real    0m35.652s
>> user    0m0.001s
>> sys     0m0.006s
>>
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.2.0"} git 4cd60f3d1683
>> real    0m20.134s
>> user    0m0.002s
>> sys     0m0.004s
>>
>> Wendall
>>
>>
>> On 02/28/2012 05:17 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
>>> Forgive the clean new thread. Hopefully it will not remain so.
>>>
>>> If you can, would you please clone https://github.com/jhs/slow_couchdb
>>>
>>> And build whatever Erlangs and CouchDB checkouts you see fit, and run
>>> the test. For example:
>>>
>>>      docs=500000 ./bench.sh small_doc.tpl
>>>
>>> That should run the test and, God willing, upload the results to a
>>> couch in the cloud. We should be able to use that information to
>>> identify who you are, whether you are on SSD, what Erlang and Couch
>>> build, and how fast it ran. Modulo bugs.
>>


Mime
View raw message