couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round
Date Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:04:08 GMT

On Mar 3, 2012, at 00:31 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> Good catch, will do in the morning.

Done.

> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
> 
> On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> 
>> Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES?
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part.
>>>> 
>>>> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
>>>> 
>>>> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424
>>>> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426
>>>> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
>>> 
>>> √
>>> 
>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0
>>> 
>>> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with
>>> the more canonical C version.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>> 
>>>> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work
>>>> * I will be driving round three, obviously
>>>> 
>>>> Let's kick some ass!
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The
>>>>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity,
>>>>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>>>>> I think we should, at a minimum:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> * Abort this round
>>>>>> * Land the R15B patch
>>>>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy)
>>>>>> * Start round three
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should try to:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424
>>>>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit.
Let's
>>>>> say
>>>>>> a week.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some
>>> sprints
>>>>> to
>>>>>> get these issues fixed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Proposed Action:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following
points
>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to
be done):
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang
R15B. A patch
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache
CouchDB 1.2.1.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance
regression
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed
an improvement
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any
significant
>>>>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken
together it
>>>>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver
and the
>>>>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still
ongoing
>>>>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 


Mime
View raw message