On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote:
> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part.
>
> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
>
> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424
> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426
> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
√
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0
Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with
the more canonical C version.
Cheers
Jan
--
> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work
> * I will be driving round three, obviously
>
> Let's kick some ass!
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The
>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity,
>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0.
>>
>>
>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>> I think we should, at a minimum:
>>>
>>> * Abort this round
>>> * Land the R15B patch
>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy)
>>> * Start round three
>>>
>>> I think we should try to:
>>>
>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424
>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues
>>>
>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's
>> say
>>> a week.
>>>
>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some sprints
>> to
>>> get these issues fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Proposed Action:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points
>> mentioned
>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch
>> is
>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB 1.2.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression
>> in
>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement
>> in
>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant
>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together it
>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and the
>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round.
>>>>
>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing
>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Jan
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>
|