Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 417949CFB for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90431 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2012 12:00:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 90394 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2012 12:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 90386 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2012 12:00:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:00:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeroen.janssen@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.52] (HELO mail-yw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.213.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:00:29 +0000 Received: by yhpp61 with SMTP id p61so550368yhp.11 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jeroen.janssen@gmail.com designates 10.101.151.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.101.151.34; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jeroen.janssen@gmail.com designates 10.101.151.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jeroen.janssen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jeroen.janssen@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.151.34]) by 10.101.151.34 with SMTP id d34mr3360687ano.19.1330171209128 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=g+IhPyLqxmMCofE19P4okXXPNmGrqQswbVp1JygOaZs=; b=lZLEklE5vEHdNDyycZ7Vtxuczua8pZlIC4tt1aXqZVM8OiU152oh7J1PbI2f/vN4hj yR/Vbod3eODHmWBL7YpfniY3YqUjcfVi2U4n6Olc30GdF/c7nVERvXqV8cqkR/CS8/F6 PAMhpqYMPctO84siyIDj2QeOs4CRufWD+XxmY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.151.34 with SMTP id d34mr2540232ano.19.1330171209076; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.45.18 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:00:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries From: Jeroen Janssen To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jason Smith wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jeroen Janssen > wrote: >> If someone can confirm that all the crash_reports are expected, then I >> can +1 this. > > So-called "crashes" are similar to Unix "kill"s. They only sometimes > match their namesake. > > A "crash" could be a software failure, but usually it is simply a > component of CouchDB restarting. During the test suite, many such > "crashes" are normal. +1