Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 349F89999 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15131 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2012 10:19:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14771 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2012 10:19:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14762 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2012 10:19:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:19:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.180] (HELO mail-lpp01m020-f180.google.com) (209.85.217.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:19:21 +0000 Received: by lbok6 with SMTP id k6so71853lbo.11 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:19:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qU0nnN6CNYapsRZ0mHUtENjhSyqINWCIpIIuZpyeknE=; b=XHNod352dBHl+e/iOGG85UcsCua246HC735Ea4UXlp0Pgjap0MGcbWZMIYTkIu0lqd YYDjjS4LcgJV6wR8yzRPQtqIsEr3YLt9P2OopiI1w753iOuDzi/IUeETD0i5IXSP3+J7 AJVGXlY4BpFwFimsmvYgOphKKqJmiMzmL4rw8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.125.20 with SMTP id mm20mr8378601lab.6.1329041941076; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.58.231 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:19:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:19:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, first round From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > I'd like some opinions on whether COUCHDB-1407 constitutes a release > blocking issue. Yes, I understand that the JSON spec is very weak on > numbers, blah blah boo splat. Is this because of the switch to ejson? > Is jiffy more compatible on this score? > > For my part, I'm close to considering it a release-blocking > regression. At the very least this change should be included at > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Breaking_changes#Changes_Between_1.1.0_and= _1.2.0 > but I'd rather it was fixed. > > B. Imo, it's a release blocking: 1. it's a regression 2. we shouldn't change the way the number has been inserted until it follows the spec. - beno=EEt