Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 042919513 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55808 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 17:20:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 55752 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 17:20:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 55744 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2012 17:20:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:20:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:20:51 +0000 Received: by lagy4 with SMTP id y4so7438946lag.11 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 10.112.44.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.44.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 10.112.44.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nslater@tumbolia.org; dkim=pass header.i=nslater@tumbolia.org Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.44.1]) by 10.112.44.1 with SMTP id a1mr6212572lbm.67.1329672030283 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sGJBQ+TCwTn3nGtbim3bAsn3nazgh5BimHHJ4DXFJSY=; b=fqywI1BiKSICxmS+KVS4qUtSjvWdQy1CjKRQgGmBpFMSfs7YTCVSrRYqnkBZ78BDVP BJ6wvLQDbB99efd3TATHu35WyNB+yYkGbmcBw9iyeguxGU+3dRSvySyp1a2VJ13PBv82 893A3ew0gH6cLQWMUZQxRqU2f9oLJOuCKVT/o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.44.1 with SMTP id a1mr5185419lbm.67.1329672030155; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.20.8 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [178.250.115.206] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:20:30 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any experts care to answer this SO query? From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554dd4806728a04b9546537 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8twNIZvj/BgMgOhGEmpFpSzKQcNRrpCRuxwWVX1ssgmOjR3yckLtdcrOPfaTww8R4oTLY X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec554dd4806728a04b9546537 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you for your mail, Roger. Once we get 1.2.0 out of the door, I will be turning my attention to the website. Are there any specific suggestions you'd like to make? I don't think we should mention Damien, specifically. There's no need to draw any further attention to it. We're an Apache project. Visionaries and leaders come and go, life moves on, etc. If you think we should mention it, what do you think we should say? As for Couchbase. Yes. I agree. I think the naming is terrible, and I think it harms our community, but there is very little I can do about that. Pursuant to the ASF trademark policies, I could make a case to the legal mailing list, and ask for guidance. I think the Couchbase name fails the likelihood of confusion test, as stipulated. What do other people think about this? cf. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:58 PM, wrote: > I think this question on stack overflow expresses a lot of the > confusion in the marketplace about the current direction of couchdb. I > hope you'll forgive me posting this to the dev group, but as a couch > evangelist myself, I share Jonathan's pain. > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9343868/confused-on-how-to-use-couchdb-on-android > > I am feeling a bit more confident about the future of couchdb having > seen the activity in this forum over the past week. However I feel, > looking from the outside in, that the project does have a perception > problem. > > The problem I think largely stems from the fact that there is nothing > on this page that reflects the online discussions that arose following > Damien's departure. > > http://couchdb.apache.org/ > > So when you are searching for information on couchdb, you tend to see > a very stale project page, and then lots of much more recent online > posts elsewhere asking if couch is dead now that the founder has left. > > I know there is a lot of sensible and sane discussion on other blogs, > but I really feel that the apache couchdb pages need to address the > matter head on and inform the community better as to the future. > > As an aside, the decision to rebrand membase as couchbase has, in my > opinion, done untold damage. This is the real issue behind the > confusion and is something I think the couchdb project needs to work > on. > > I'm happy to help where I can ... I love couch and use it as the > backend for many of my mobile projects. Having a restful database that > talks JSON is such a perfect fit for so many applications that really, > couchdb should be storming ahead of other nosql options and yet I find > myself having to work harder and harder to justify its use over (say) > mongo. The reason I am having to work harder is purely a perception > problem and hence I feel this is the area that needs a bit more work! > > All that said, I'm so glad I joined the dev group last week, it's > given me a lot more confidence that things are moving in a positive > direction ... > > Roger > --bcaec554dd4806728a04b9546537--