couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Please report your indexing speed
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:08:35 GMT

On Feb 29, 2012, at 18:44 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> 
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 18:42 , Robert Newson wrote:
> 
>> My new test again;
>> 
>> Filling db.
>> done
>> server is;
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.1.2a785d32f-git"}
>> Building views.
>> 
>> real	0m24.973s
>> user	0m0.006s
>> sys	0m0.004s
>> done
>> ~/Source/sandbox $ ./bench.sh
>> Filling db.
>> done
>> server is;
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.2.0"}
>> Building views.
>> 
>> real	0m21.925s
>> user	0m0.006s
>> sys	0m0.003s
>> done
>> 
>> Important Note: The builds that show *regression* were all using
>> SpiderMonkey 1.7.0. The tests above were 1.8.5. I think that's
>> significant. Can other people who saw regressions report their
>> spidermonkey version?
> 
> 
> Good observation!
> 
> Except for the linux VPS one that had 1.8.0, all previous reports have been
> on 1.8.5.

On the Mac from earlier, using 1.7.0 via homebrew:

1.1.1: 0m54.203s
1.2.x: 0m55.639s

Cheers
Jan
-- 


> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> -- 
> 
>> 
>> B.
>> 
>> On 29 February 2012 17:25, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>> I've produced a new script that reproduces the view regression. I
>>>>>> apologize in advance for exposing my awful Bash scripting abilities
>>>>>> (also my inability to write "pure" shell. Your "Bashism" is my "it
>>>>>> works").
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I get 0m56.521s for 1.1.x and 1m17.108s for 1.2.x. That is, 1.1.x
>>>>>> complete the same task in only 72% of the time that 1.2.x takes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://friendpaste.com/UI1OcECLEzR6i4D75LqQy
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> hrm with the same script:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.2.0 :
>>>>> real    0m23.842s
>>>>> user    0m0.007s
>>>>> sys     0m0.004s
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.1.1:
>>>>> real    0m28.625s
>>>>> user    0m0.008s
>>>>> sys     0m0.005s
>>>>> 
>>>>> hw specs :
>>>>> $ uname -a
>>>>> Darwin enki.local 11.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.3.0: Thu Jan 12
>>>>> 18:47:41 PST 2012; root:xnu-1699.24.23~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>>>>> mba 2011:  i7  4 GB SSD 256 GB
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> - benoƮt
>>>> 
>>>> Just for my curiosity I tested it in the  couchdb based distribution I
>>>> maintain (head, last mochiweb + jiffy) :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> real    0m19.539s
>>>> user    0m0.007s
>>>> sys     0m0.005s
>>>> done
>>> 
>>> I launched the tests a second time and same results:
>>> 
>>> 1.1.1 :
>>> real    0m29.155s
>>> user    0m0.009s
>>> sys     0m0.006s
>>> 
>>> 1.2.0 :
>>> 
>>> real    0m25.466s
>>> user    0m0.008s
>>> sys     0m0.005s
> 


Mime
View raw message