Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1BC49374 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87563 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 00:06:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87478 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 00:06:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87470 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2012 00:06:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:06:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fdmanana@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.52] (HELO mail-pw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.160.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:06:47 +0000 Received: by pbcc7 with SMTP id c7so1921987pbc.11 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:06:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=N+m61zWJ2765GKyBAfmaklQzQ55pM+zrngLenD1AGhw=; b=xncquU3FLzS7PEPk0hMig6KK6lRB4PP9JMhmNNatvO4qphI5V8mfj8O8UlxvULGMSu n5nloixaGQiC/qXsXBWQpG3v4Fc2damv28/nbR6cfAhp3e50PWO9I9D97jqkRc3wz2/b WG0nDhOaV8OTo//2UfUcBS0o/5jflJ03rvDeA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.75.135 with SMTP id c7mr22022959pbw.43.1326672387484; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:06:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: fdmanana@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.131.16 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:06:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:06:27 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hdqLrQAFDmSx5AM30jsSoDEYyhc Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.2.0 bug fix question From: Filipe David Manana To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041a438e63aabc04b699fce5 --f46d041a438e63aabc04b699fce5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sunday, January 15, 2012, Randall Leeds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 13:55, Randall Leeds wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 13:47, Dustin Sallings wrote: >>> >>> I don't want to divert the RFC question for what's really a Q, but I'd like to ask as it directly affects usability for me. >>> >>> When going through the Couchbase Single development, I hit tons of bugs in the replicator DB, most of which Filipe fixed for me pretty quickly. As this was before the git integration and was done in our git repos, it's hard to know whether all those contributions made it back. >>> >>> I don't know if actual Apache bugs were fixed, because of the workflow. I'd hit something, tell Filipe, he'd give me a fix and I'd be happy. Do we know if all those things made it back into replicator DB? All are already present in the 1.1.1 release. Thanks for the heads up Dustin. >> >> There has been a pretty constant stream of commits to the replicator >> in the 1.2.x branch and many closed JIRA tickets. Filipe is probably >> the only person who can really answer that. >> >> $ git log --pretty=oneline --author=Filipe 1.1.1.. | wc -l >> 295 >> >> $ git log --pretty=oneline --author=Filipe 1.1.1.. | grep -i "replic" | wc -l >> 103 >> > > That was on master, but the numbers aren't much different for 1.2.x. > >> :-D >> >>> >>> -- >>> dustin sallings >>> >>> >>> > -- Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." --f46d041a438e63aabc04b699fce5--