Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C7129579 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34494 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 21:40:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34437 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 21:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34429 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2012 21:40:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of klimpong@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:40:33 +0000 Received: by obbup3 with SMTP id up3so5725248obb.11 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:40:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wejH+pASnmYvxL3pgxOOq86XcL6UI6Y6Kgkvc+GrQ78=; b=qOWE3MbZFDsUQxYzQ1OAda67w6it523AOufQ9wpdnaZu4yme4QZ/CEEC4PVgW/DiQm AtNYsO2OmiIbDG0Kw/uzZy8rc5fCBJR3wvhuS16tyzsT7QMSeHS3y/+Jk8CwWLeTiN/D Zy+eDbD2u6zow4xa8728VfMrwx8d+fwHRZIyQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.52.8 with SMTP id p8mr16520010obo.24.1326145212364; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:40:12 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: till@php.net Sender: klimpong@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.52.2 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:40:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:40:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DJDYQgkDKR6aGQApaxgbHgxq3Kg Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0 From: till To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93997674db5c004b61f3e68 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae93997674db5c004b61f3e68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just looked at CHANGES, a few questions: 1) Can anyone go into detail on the replicator? (E.g. where are the configuration options.) 2) Can anyone mention how snappy/zlib impacts performance? Most of the stuff is a little vague for my taste =96 maybe the Jira issues explain the additions better. If so, should they be linked always? Till On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:34 PM, till wrote: > Can haz release? :) > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Randall Leeds w= rote: > >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 13:22, Robert Newson wrote: >> > I'm checking it now. Jan did his JIRA dance, so I think we're clean on >> > that end. I'm looking into whether all the fixes got backported, etc, >> > and I'll also read over the full 1.1.x->1.2.x diff. >> >> Just checked over my commits and everything appropriate is back-ported. >> >> Good to go from my end. +1 on calling the vote. >> >> > >> > B. >> > >> > On 6 January 2012 21:19, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> Hey chaps, >> >> >> >> Let's pull our finger out and get 1.2.0 shipped. >> >> >> >> Do we have everything in trunk that we want in 1.2.0, or are there an= y >> >> patches y'all are sitting on? >> >> >> >> Also, can you all check NEWS and CHANGES to make sure they are up to >> date? >> >> >> >> Thanks all, >> >> >> >> N >> > > --14dae93997674db5c004b61f3e68--