From dev-return-20069-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Tue Jan 10 10:19:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 254F0B94B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48366 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 10:02:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 48290 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 10:02:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 48210 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 10:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of randall.leeds@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.180] (HELO mail-iy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.210.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:02:04 +0000 Received: by iadk27 with SMTP id k27so776535iad.11 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gIcC8kC3r5nlEB7hoO8/F7l97b1ZbSVCJVjFYFTqSu4=; b=plr0KGyV1cPqb+b0sIPbAn0EpqgXgaRBr81/qHDN7LosJPytxb9D7DpEgKZj0OMe8O y5GULkpALdTbl5DYd0LzuI9crsy+Gk9km2MEc0tiObeaLuXO8GIcdNA6suzpoyNk96TT oxpja6pGlShxwGwNODWmaEiub3RZQHCCBuNwU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.131.136 with SMTP id z8mr21942961ics.5.1326189703547; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.165.72 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:01:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:01:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0 From: Randall Leeds To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Cc: till@php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 00:31, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 23:19, Filipe David Manana wrote: >>> 2) Can anyone mention how snappy/zlib impacts performance? >> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1120 > > So does 1.2 have both the new JSON implementation and the snappy > compression? It seems like all the benchmarks in the ticket are either > compression or JSON NIF, but not both. Both. They are not alternatives. Compression occurs after JSON decoding when storing, decompression before JSON encoding on the way out. You'll have to test the impact on your workload with each and decide on the settings that are right for you. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan