couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Cottlehuber <>
Subject Re: [Windows] proposed binary build changes
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:12:53 GMT
On 23 January 2012 08:00, Jeroen Janssen <> wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems to be ok, since I get:
>>  All 2 tests passed.
> I also tried compaction again, but it didn't compress the 800Mb .couch
> file, so I guess something else might be needed aswell?
> Best regards,
> Jeroen

Hi Jeroen,

Thanks heaps, missing DLL is sorted -
Either of these will work but in my testing R15B seems both faster and
more memory efficient.

NB I am testing compaction by going from 1.1.1 -> 1.2.x here, as the
on-disk format changes
in between. I don't get compression either using your procedure above
even with a POST /_restart
in between. Hopefully Filipe can clarify what's expected here.

01/23/2012  03:25 PM       246,907,000 fatty_no_snappy.couch
01/23/2012  03:19 PM        38,830,200 fatty_snappy.couch
01/23/2012  01:57 PM         3,104,881 sluggy_no_snappy.couch
01/23/2012  01:58 PM         3,072,113 sluggy_snappy.couch

- sluggy is a set of small docs, all around 4KiB size, generated via
- fatty is a set of large docs, all around ~400KiB size, artificially
full of

These json blobs are in and are formatted
for _bulk_docs. I'm testing your approach using


View raw message