couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:46:54 GMT
If it's a regression, before. If not, after.

B.

On 15 January 2012 19:40, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Are we going to punt on a Windows binary, Dave?
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dave@muse.net.nz> wrote:
>
>> On 15 January 2012 19:05, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> > Bump. Dave? Gonna move without if you don't speak up. :)
>>
>> Sorry!! Literally *just* finished looking at this.
>>
>> TL;DR - let's roll 1.2.0.
>>
>> I don't see any *functional* issues in the failures from the test
>> suite - attachments are written, and read, correctly. For some as yet
>> unknown reason the MD5 is different on Windows vs Linux & Mac OS, but
>> this has been present for some time. It's only turned up  as a result
>> of additional tests applied in COUCHDB-1337.
>>
>> The underlying crypto:md5 values are the same, and so is the raw HTTP
>> data. I am still digging through mochi to where this comes from.
>>
>> I don't see any issues for replication - can anybody confirm? This
>> looks like a dev issue rather than user impacting.
>>
>> from 1.1.1_js-1.8.0:
>> 12> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
>> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>>
>> from 1.2.x:
>> 8> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
>> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>>
>> A+
>> Dave
>>

Mime
View raw message