couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randall Leeds <randall.le...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:23:20 GMT
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:38, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
> I'd like to merge the persistent cookies feature (COUCHDB-1304) into
> 1.2.x if it's not too late.

+1

>
> B.
>
> On 16 January 2012 11:26, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>> I merged master so I can't be positive which commit is the fix yet but
>> this one looks likely:
>> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/commit/e05aa73f1acbfe877f7f0b6214f572b5a42b3db8
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 16 January 2012 01:09, Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 15, 2012, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I'd say it's too late for the ibrowse fix but we should pick it up for 1.3
>>>
>>> Can you point us to what that ibrowse fix is (e.g. Github commit link)?
>>> As far as I can see there are no fixes upstream that we don't have in 1.2.x
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>>
>>>> B.
>>>>
>>>> On 15 January 2012 21:31, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>>>> I await your feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's a regression, before. If not, after.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15 January 2012 19:40, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
wrote:
>>>>>> > Are we going to punt on a Windows binary, Dave?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dave@muse.net.nz>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> On 15 January 2012 19:05, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
wrote:
>>>>>> >> > Bump. Dave? Gonna move without if you don't speak up.
:)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Sorry!! Literally *just* finished looking at this.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> TL;DR - let's roll 1.2.0.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I don't see any *functional* issues in the failures from
the test
>>>>>> >> suite - attachments are written, and read, correctly. For
some as yet
>>>>>> >> unknown reason the MD5 is different on Windows vs Linux
& Mac OS, but
>>>>>> >> this has been present for some time. It's only turned up
 as a result
>>>>>> >> of additional tests applied in COUCHDB-1337.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The underlying crypto:md5 values are the same, and so is
the raw HTTP
>>>>>> >> data. I am still digging through mochi to where this comes
from.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I don't see any issues for replication - can anybody confirm?
This
>>>>>> >> looks like a dev issue rather than user impacting.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> from 1.1.1_js-1.8.0:
>>>>>> >> 12> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
>>>>>> >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> from 1.2.x:
>>>>>> >> 8> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
>>>>>> >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> A+
>>>>>> >> Dave
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>  Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>  That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

Mime
View raw message