couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:40:16 GMT
Are we going to punt on a Windows binary, Dave?

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dave@muse.net.nz> wrote:

> On 15 January 2012 19:05, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > Bump. Dave? Gonna move without if you don't speak up. :)
>
> Sorry!! Literally *just* finished looking at this.
>
> TL;DR - let's roll 1.2.0.
>
> I don't see any *functional* issues in the failures from the test
> suite - attachments are written, and read, correctly. For some as yet
> unknown reason the MD5 is different on Windows vs Linux & Mac OS, but
> this has been present for some time. It's only turned up  as a result
> of additional tests applied in COUCHDB-1337.
>
> The underlying crypto:md5 values are the same, and so is the raw HTTP
> data. I am still digging through mochi to where this comes from.
>
> I don't see any issues for replication - can anybody confirm? This
> looks like a dev issue rather than user impacting.
>
> from 1.1.1_js-1.8.0:
> 12> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>
> from 1.2.x:
> 8> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary).
> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">>
>
> A+
> Dave
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message