From dev-return-19794-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org  Thu Dec 22 16:49:15 2011
Return-Path: <dev-return-19794-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61AA29BD8
	for <apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 62075 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 16:49:14 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62038 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 16:49:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62030 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2011 16:49:14 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:49:14 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexander.uvarov@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.180] (HELO mail-ey0-f180.google.com) (209.85.215.180)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:49:08 +0000
Received: by eaac11 with SMTP id c11so5977034eaa.11
        for <dev@couchdb.apache.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:48:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=A7eC1DBreECtOxleki8xHpIsxdlIXVIL5Y7pdWFZ8w0=;
        b=sJ2yzLcD5ZLztMUDSc2CNY2msVe81i7TtkY6GFieeWYo0ka7zC09tfnnWFuDuH5Fio
         1lFcpeG9dzZuRyi1+roiE+Powex/yZd4gETvtonMLd72n4W/YQ13tKNMixmXTOmCqp/I
         uzgtKRzawxemD030LXfo8sqHK1Truck3+wRMw=
Received: by 10.204.151.209 with SMTP id d17mr3477178bkw.52.1324572527260;
 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:48:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.117.197 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:48:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D60E7255-46AA-4B4E-AC94-15F6801AE50D@yahoo.com>
References: <CAB5u=zXX0pKiBOfg+UcYopGbeE53=Npp+-vX8rNOqQOi1ty77Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABvT1DGdn+ib9Tc6-9Rb-11KDgo-_-eE6QBo_zPy=ZdwY2Wk1A@mail.gmail.com> <D60E7255-46AA-4B4E-AC94-15F6801AE50D@yahoo.com>
From: Alexander Uvarov <alexander.uvarov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:48:06 +0600
Message-ID: <CAB5u=zX7ufhEb_7_+dhWS29=PQAeBiBYsPpzi8g6k+xo0MEPkg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is it possible to bring back optional old all-or-nothing behaviour?
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

And can become much easier with multi-document transactions as an option.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Pepijn de Vos <pepijndevos@yahoo.com> wrote:
> But not everyone needs a cluster. I like CouchDB because it's easy, not because "it scales", and in some situations, all_or_nothing is easy.
>