couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pepijn de Vos <pepijnde...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Is it possible to bring back optional old all-or-nothing behaviour?
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:43:17 GMT
But not everyone needs a cluster. I like CouchDB because it's easy, not because "it scales",
and in some situations, all_or_nothing is easy.

Pepijn

On Dec 22, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Robert Newson wrote:

> The all_or_nothing option (both old and new semantic) are,
> respectively, impossible or very hard, to achieve in a cluster.
> 
> I would like to see all_or_nothing removed entirely in CouchDB 2.0.
> 
> B.
> 
> On 22 December 2011 15:57, Alexander Uvarov <alexander.uvarov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> With release 0.9 of CouchDB, bulk update semantics have been changed
>> so that a CouchDB server will not reject updates in case of conflicts.
>> IIRC old behavior was removed because it does not scale and this
>> commit dropped out much number of users who want to simplify their
>> development by dropping SQL and ORMs in some cases.
>> Current all-or-nothing behavior does not work in BigCouch by Cloudant,
>> I guess it does not shard. It does not shard, but still exists. So why
>> not take a chance to A_C_ID bulk docs?
>> Why not bring previous behavior as an option? This will much simplify
>> development of simple apps, apps for smartphones, apps with 1 database
>> per small number of client where sharding, clustering and replication
>> will never find a place, in other words "single master" apps.


Mime
View raw message