couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bob Dionne (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1367) When settings revs_limit on db - the db increases its update_seq counter when viewing stats - but not when getting changes
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:09:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172401#comment-13172401
] 

Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-1367:
-------------------------------------

sure, I think the confusion is this (from the WIKI):

last_seq is the sequence number of the last update returned. (Currently it will always be
the same as the seq of the last item in results.)

It doesn't say that this is identical to update_seq. They are two different things, or at
least became that way when other features such as set_revs_limit were added. It might be better
for now in your app to use last_seq if you can


                
> When settings revs_limit on db - the db increases its update_seq counter when viewing
stats - but not when getting changes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1367
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.1
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Henrik Hofmeister
>            Assignee: Bob Dionne
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: revs_limit
>
> If you put a number to _revs_limit on a db (to update it) - the http://host/dbname/ info
document gets an increase in update_seq number - however the changes feed does not contain
this change (while its not a change). This causes the update_seq in the dbinfo doc and the
last seq in the changes feed to differ - which breaks any application depending on the update_seq
number as the expected sequence size of the db (in my case - couchdb-lucene that will only
respond to stale requests because it thinks its not up to date)
> I know this is an edge case - but still its something fairly fundamental - that clearly
is not working as intended. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message