Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A85D9C00 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82260 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82124 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82116 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:04:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.244.253.218] (HELO mail.traeumt.net) (80.244.253.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:04:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.182] (p5795B961.dip.t-dialin.net [87.149.185.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.traeumt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CBBC3C18C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 Release, Round 2 From: Jan Lehnardt In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:04:23 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) On Oct 21, 2011, at 18:53 , Noah Slater wrote: > Actually, I think I'm going to give this a -1 without testing it. >=20 > We still haven't ratified how releases are meant to work with Git, so = I > don't see that we can make a release at the present time. We need to = agree > on how we're going to do this, and document it in both the release = procedure > and test procedure before we can proceed. I think the silent consensus to not change the procedure for stable = branches and ongoing votes. And I don't buy the "incomplete wiki documentation" missing the git and = still having the SVN commands in there argument. I don't argue we should not = fix it all up (we should!), but plenty of people had no trouble casting a vote = that I'd say it'd be okay to run this release with "wrong" instructions (that = we only had for two or so releases so far anyway and that we had to amend = each time to clarify, so this -1 could be retroactively apply to these = previous releases). That said, if this community decides we should sort out the git/tagging = issue first and update the Test Procedure wiki page before releasing or even = voting on 1.1.1, I'd be fine with that. Cheers Jan --=20 >=20 > Unless someone else has a very good reason why this doesn't matter? >=20 > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Paul Davis = wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater = wrote: >>> Can someone provide assistance on the new Test procedure please: >>>=20 >>>=20 >> = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201110.mbox/%3CCA+Y+4= 47FXqVGx8ow=3DEwqM86Cn9ePB1cNBMVHK9Ku4OGuJByzxw@mail.gmail.com%3E >>>=20 >>> I am not sure how best to update the workflow for Git. >>>=20 >>=20 >> git clone http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git && git >> checkout X.Y.Z >>=20 >> The more I think about it, the more I think the requirement to not >> require a local checkout is silly. You're still requiring a copy of >> the VCS locally. Just because Git can make it a super awesome local >> copy of the entire repo seems like something we shouldn't penalize it >> for. >>=20 >> Granted, Noah usually has a reasoning, so maybe I'm missing something = else? >>=20 >>> This is important. *waves hands* >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Robert Newson >> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> This is the second release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 >>>>=20 >>>> Changes since round 1; >>>>=20 >>>> * Fix object sealing with SpiderMonkey 1.7.0 >>>> * Update CHANGES/NEWS to reflect COUCHDB-1129 >>>> * Fix JavaScript CLI test runner >>>>=20 >>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>>> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the = release >>>> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report = your >>>> results and vote to this thread. >>>>=20 >>>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>>>=20 >>>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.1/ >>>>=20 >>>> Instructions for validating the release tarball can be found here: >>>>=20 >>>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/ >>>>=20 >>>> Instructions for testing the build artefacts can be found here: >>>>=20 >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >>>>=20 >>>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.1 tag in Git: >>>>=20 >>>> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz >>>> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.md5 >>>> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc >>>> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.sha >>>>=20 >>>> Test ALL the things. >>>>=20 >>>> B. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20