Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23EF89A7E for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73573 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 16:57:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73542 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2011 16:57:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73534 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2011 16:57:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:57:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:57:12 +0000 Received: by bkbzs2 with SMTP id zs2so7063207bkb.11 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:56:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5BOKU9ZuGH0prZkrJniqEOlO7gF6iw6fevSsFeYWzoQ=; b=dtMAuF5vAOOVUk/9Vy0NIwCJkKZYL4GhPwXp5ua3uaBMf45lbkQXDwVDR1wXJPdiYK nG3U3b27AEa/f6ucljbX7Ur6cebs30MaDBYoIEguur0SwbVnP6BIOA6vdJ5rmc2L9wuM 2r93XEycxZYXt7j4vG1eFHGmwx+p5G6tmHWxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.153 with SMTP id y25mr1408348bkv.62.1319216211847; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.40.195 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:56:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [87.198.113.211] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:56:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 Release, Round 2 From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce050b06c8104afd1f508 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ce050b06c8104afd1f508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to clarify, I reached this conclusion after seeing: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_procedure?action=diff&rev1=66&rev2=67 It occurred to me that we're attempting to release without documenting what we're doing first. The documentation above is incomplete. Our official release procedure is still based in Subversion commands. I think we need to pin this down officially before proceeding. On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Actually, I think I'm going to give this a -1 without testing it. > > We still haven't ratified how releases are meant to work with Git, so I > don't see that we can make a release at the present time. We need to agree > on how we're going to do this, and document it in both the release procedure > and test procedure before we can proceed. > > Unless someone else has a very good reason why this doesn't matter? > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater >> wrote: >> > Can someone provide assistance on the new Test procedure please: >> > >> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201110.mbox/%3CCA+Y+447FXqVGx8ow=EwqM86Cn9ePB1cNBMVHK9Ku4OGuJByzxw@mail.gmail.com%3E >> > >> > I am not sure how best to update the workflow for Git. >> > >> >> git clone http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git && git >> checkout X.Y.Z >> >> The more I think about it, the more I think the requirement to not >> require a local checkout is silly. You're still requiring a copy of >> the VCS locally. Just because Git can make it a super awesome local >> copy of the entire repo seems like something we shouldn't penalize it >> for. >> >> Granted, Noah usually has a reasoning, so maybe I'm missing something >> else? >> >> > This is important. *waves hands* >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Robert Newson >> wrote: >> > >> >> This is the second release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 >> >> >> >> Changes since round 1; >> >> >> >> * Fix object sealing with SpiderMonkey 1.7.0 >> >> * Update CHANGES/NEWS to reflect COUCHDB-1129 >> >> * Fix JavaScript CLI test runner >> >> >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> >> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the >> release >> >> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your >> >> results and vote to this thread. >> >> >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.1/ >> >> >> >> Instructions for validating the release tarball can be found here: >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/ >> >> >> >> Instructions for testing the build artefacts can be found here: >> >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >> >> >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.1 tag in Git: >> >> >> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz >> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.md5 >> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc >> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.sha >> >> >> >> Test ALL the things. >> >> >> >> B. >> >> >> > >> > > --0015175ce050b06c8104afd1f508--