Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 Release
From: Klaus Trainer <klaus_trainer@posteo.de>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABvT1DF-KwGtWsn3jsfw4oF0k1BJ8xS=UsciEbr=QuJ0eNUAgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	 <CABvT1DG5RYdo_gZeos+jB31bLQF+HKOCkcbGZ9M9K0J8-X0sbw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAJNb-9rAtXniJs76GAhqPO-e7+6FhEEM9L8s2ST7uRLs9+Wsjw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAL3q7H5gYD95KZdS_2qemvKPoo_F_BMhMLkC_fngOsbT=9-Xeg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAJNb-9pbDpMBHvRmC4uxvVmRes-5Sm1Zbv2n6SWonnfd98rN6w@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAL3q7H6YiLnZE5oEdCZwp0kcwPfXFb7cx0HMLS2pwdQgEMp_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAJNb-9qO-rvXeCUFJvj+gPBWu5PS4vBATfR2Dtgmp1VDe9R+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CABvT1DEdZcneGzy_V8t02wQzVr-3hccEYh3nPH1NhGpTzoe5kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAJNb-9q3J9KfibSwQUJ_FuLifhp0kVEd--YSnPBmDNt8=Uyr7g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9B6185E9-67B7-4452-8513-38CE1E65B13A@projectmastermind.com>
	 <CABvT1DEK1oCbdgAakv+HsH=yBBouJC2-ik5e82Ey0L-XQ13rDA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1319143019.4600.6.camel@devil>
	 <CABvT1DF-KwGtWsn3jsfw4oF0k1BJ8xS=UsciEbr=QuJ0eNUAgA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-C/oIxIcMROBN02YVlbY+"
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:51:55 +0200
Message-ID: <1319143915.4600.16.camel@devil>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-C/oIxIcMROBN02YVlbY+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hehe, given the fact that the voting round has been aborted, I thought
it would be clear that it relates to your most recent reply ;)

Sorry, I've missed that the respective thread for that topic (i.e.,
"futon tests") had grown meanwhile. I should have better replied on that
one.

- K


On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 21:38 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
> What is that -1 related to?
>=20
> On 20 October 2011 21:36, Klaus Trainer <klaus_trainer@posteo.de> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 18:57 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
> >> Too late.
> >>
> >> I'm inclined to work with Paul Davis and make 1.1.1 the last time that
> >> there *is* a Futon test suite.
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >> On 20 October 2011 18:54, J. Lee Coltrane <lee@projectmastermind.com> =
wrote:
> >> >
> >> > FWIW, the patch attached to COUCHDB-1310
> >> >  (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1310)
> >> >
> >> > will fix a great many (all, afaik) of the futon test "hangs" (the ca=
ses where
> >> > the tests get "stuck", and never complete).  Without this patch, I w=
as
> >> > never able to get a complete run through the browser tests in 1.1.1 =
RC1.
> >> > With the patch, I still get test failures, but at least I can get th=
rough all the
> >> > tests without restarting the browser.
> >> >
> >> > The patch is tiny -- it just swaps the order of two lines of code, i=
n the
> >> > '/_restart' handler, so that the http response gets written *before*=
 the server
> >> > is restarted (rather than after).
> >> >
> >> > As test instability continues to be a hot topic, maybe this patch is=
 worth
> >> > considering for inclusion in the next 1.1.1 RC?
> >> >
> >> > -Lee
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>=
 wrote:
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks for all the responses so far. Unfortunately I am aborting t=
his round.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It turns out there is a serious bug in this 1.1.1 candidate when u=
sing
> >> >>> SpiderMonkey 1.7.0. Instead of sealing the 'doc' parameter to view=
s,
> >> >>> we seal the object that defines the seal function, which then caus=
es
> >> >>> all kinds of 'X is read-only' events.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It's a one word fix, so a new 1.1.1 candidate will be out very soo=
n,
> >> >>> and it should not invalidate any of these results.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> B.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> :(
> >> >>
> >> >> It would worth to look at this erlang warning too imo. Hopefully i
> >> >> will have some wifi at the hotel tonight.I will see if I can make i=
t.
> >> >>
> >> >> - benoit
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >


--=-C/oIxIcMROBN02YVlbY+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=mJeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-C/oIxIcMROBN02YVlbY+--