couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CouchDB 1.1.1
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:23:29 GMT
If there are no objections, I'm going to build the first 1.1.1
candidate in the morning and start a new thread for the release.

B.

On 6 October 2011 12:05, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks all, I've pushed the change to 1.1.x. make check and futon all
> pass; review would still be nice. :) I simply reverted the two
> commits.
>
> B.
>
> On 6 October 2011 12:02, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote:
>>
>>> There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as
>>> 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those
>>> conditions.
>>>
>>> Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and
>>> then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING
>>> CHANGES").
>>>
>>> I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>> On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in
>>>>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor
>>>>> bug fix release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> B.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it
>>>> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the
>>>> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking
>>>> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x.
>>>>
>>>> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an
>>>> informal vote so that I can blame someone else.
>>>>
>>>>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, its release blocking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x
to
>>>>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep
this
>>>>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate
>>>>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release
>>>>>>> artifact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA)
around
>>>>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's
release
>>>>>>> blocking?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message