couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CouchDB 1.1.1
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:05:37 GMT
Thanks all, I've pushed the change to 1.1.x. make check and futon all
pass; review would still be nice. :) I simply reverted the two
commits.

B.

On 6 October 2011 12:02, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as
>> 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those
>> conditions.
>>
>> Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and
>> then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING
>> CHANGES").
>>
>> I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x.
>
> +1
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in
>>>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed.
>>>>
>>>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor
>>>> bug fix release.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> B.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure.
>>>
>>> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it
>>> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the
>>> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking
>>> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x.
>>>
>>> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an
>>> informal vote so that I can blame someone else.
>>>
>>>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, its release blocking.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x
to
>>>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep this
>>>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate
>>>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release
>>>>>> artifact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA) around
>>>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's release
>>>>>> blocking?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message