couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randall Leeds <randall.le...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CouchDB 1.1.1
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:42:55 GMT
Oh, and did anyone mention that the workaround is to make your JS functions
actually contain code?
I think it's worth pointing out that this might not really be a serious
problem, per se.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:41, Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:37, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> 1.1.1 contains many important fixes, holding it up to get 1.8.5
>> support in seems odd to me. The breakage also seems dramatic for a bug
>> fix release and there was wide agreement on that point.
>>
>> Putting all of that aside, what should we do? Make it configurable at
>> build time? Introduce all this breakage in 1.1.1 and slap a big
>> warning on it?
>>
>
> It's already configurable at build time via --with-js-*....
> And again, I don't think there was a problem with any official release,
> just some not official version some distros yanked out of a xulrunner
> tarball.
> If you must keep the support reverted, do so. I'll say I'm -0 on it. Just a
> bit of a bummer.
>
>
>>
>> I'm still voting for the current state of 1.1.x, which doesn't include
>> 1.8.5 support or the paren change.
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 6 October 2011 19:34, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 6 Oct 2011, at 19:31, Paul Davis wrote:
>> >
>> >> That was awfully quick. :/
>> >
>> > Agreed.
>> >
>> >> I would prefer to make this a social
>> >> contract by doing something along the lines of requiring people to run
>> >> ./configure --yes-really-give-me-1.8.5
>> >
>> > -1
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message