couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: Tweaking the release procedure
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:07:43 GMT
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:

Sure, that works.  It makes little difference to me.  Why do you think it's
> important?


It's important for the list of tags people see in the repository.

Compare:

vote/1.1.1/1
vote/1.1.1/2
vote/1.1.1/3
vote/1.2.0/1
vote/1.2.0/2
vote/1.2.1/1
vote/1.2.2/1
vote/1.2.2/2
vote/1.2.2/3
release/1.1.1
release/1.2.0
release/1.2.1
release/1.2.2

With:

1.1.1
1.1.1-vote1
1.1.1-vote2
1.1.1-vote3
1.2.0
1.2.0-vote1
1.2.1
1.2.1-vote1
1.2.1-vote2
1.2.2
1.2.2-vote1
1.2.2-vote2
1.2.2-vote3

I think there is a much clearer separation of concerns in the first example.

My goal is to keep our voting artefacts as far away from our release
artefacts as possible.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message