couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 Release, Round 2
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:56:51 GMT
Just to clarify, I reached this conclusion after seeing:

http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_procedure?action=diff&rev1=66&rev2=67

It occurred to me that we're attempting to release without documenting what
we're doing first. The documentation above is incomplete. Our official
release procedure is still based in Subversion commands. I think we need to
pin this down officially before proceeding.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:

> Actually, I think I'm going to give this a -1 without testing it.
>
> We still haven't ratified how releases are meant to work with Git, so I
> don't see that we can make a release at the present time. We need to agree
> on how we're going to do this, and document it in both the release procedure
> and test procedure before we can proceed.
>
> Unless someone else has a very good reason why this doesn't matter?
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Can someone provide assistance on the new Test procedure please:
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201110.mbox/%3CCA+Y+447FXqVGx8ow=EwqM86Cn9ePB1cNBMVHK9Ku4OGuJByzxw@mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > I am not sure how best to update the workflow for Git.
>> >
>>
>> git clone http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git && git
>> checkout X.Y.Z
>>
>> The more I think about it, the more I think the requirement to not
>> require a local checkout is silly. You're still requiring a copy of
>> the VCS locally. Just because Git can make it a super awesome local
>> copy of the entire repo seems like something we shouldn't penalize it
>> for.
>>
>> Granted, Noah usually has a reasoning, so maybe I'm missing something
>> else?
>>
>> > This is important. *waves hands*
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is the second release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.1.1
>> >>
>> >> Changes since round 1;
>> >>
>> >> * Fix object sealing with SpiderMonkey 1.7.0
>> >> * Update CHANGES/NEWS to reflect COUCHDB-1129
>> >> * Fix JavaScript CLI test runner
>> >>
>> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> >> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>> release
>> >> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your
>> >> results and vote to this thread.
>> >>
>> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>> >>
>> >>  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.1/
>> >>
>> >> Instructions for validating the release tarball can be found here:
>> >>
>> >>  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/
>> >>
>> >> Instructions for testing the build artefacts can be found here:
>> >>
>> >>  http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>> >>
>> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.1 tag in Git:
>> >>
>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz
>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.md5
>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.sha
>> >>
>> >> Test ALL the things.
>> >>
>> >> B.
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message