couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Tweaking the release procedure
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:15:06 GMT
On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Sure, that works.  It makes little difference to me.  Why do you think it's
>> important?
> 
> 
> It's important for the list of tags people see in the repository.
> 
> Compare:
> 
> vote/1.1.1/1
> vote/1.1.1/2
> vote/1.1.1/3
> vote/1.2.0/1
> vote/1.2.0/2
> vote/1.2.1/1
> vote/1.2.2/1
> vote/1.2.2/2
> vote/1.2.2/3
> release/1.1.1
> release/1.2.0
> release/1.2.1
> release/1.2.2
> 
> With:
> 
> 1.1.1
> 1.1.1-vote1
> 1.1.1-vote2
> 1.1.1-vote3
> 1.2.0
> 1.2.0-vote1
> 1.2.1
> 1.2.1-vote1
> 1.2.1-vote2
> 1.2.2
> 1.2.2-vote1
> 1.2.2-vote2
> 1.2.2-vote3
> 
> I think there is a much clearer separation of concerns in the first example.
> 
> My goal is to keep our voting artefacts as far away from our release
> artefacts as possible.

Ok, I was wondering if you had something else in mind.  I don't see much possibility for confusion
either way.
Mime
View raw message